There's a kind of post-modern irony in the fact that some of the final images of Julia Gillard as Australian Prime Minister to flood the mass media depict her knitting a toy for the new royal baby. Why is our feminist heroine doing something so stereotypically feminine? The rest of the tale, though, has a more classical feel, like a Shakespearean tragedy with its cycle of hubris and retribution. Many of my feminist friends feel Gillard's treatment over the last few months is a sign of ongoing sexism and misogyny in politics and the media. There is something in what they say. "Ditch the witch", the fake menu and (if we reach back to the beginning) Bill Heffernan suggesting she wasn't qualified to lead the country because she didn't have children are all incredibly gendered pieces of abuse. But when Rudd was deposed three years ago, did anyone say it happened because he is a man? At risk of alienating some good friends I have to say I'm not enti
'Contemplating the teeming life of the shore, we have an uneasy sense of the communication of some universal truth that lies just beyond our grasp.' - Rachel Carson