tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-146183364287787287.post64424293453391870..comments2024-01-24T23:01:01.168+10:00Comments on Painting Fakes: Lunatic, Liar, Lord or...Jonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11272544252649766985noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-146183364287787287.post-32164259325464624312013-03-22T17:29:33.350+10:002013-03-22T17:29:33.350+10:00I'm not actually suggesting we start with eith...I'm not actually suggesting we start with either premise - that the Bible is accurate, or that it isn't. For the argument to work as a piece of logic you need to start from an open position - it may or may not be accurate - and then work from there. If you simply want to accept by faith that the Bible is accurate, I have no problem with that, but then the while argument becomes completely unnecessary since the Bible never suggests that Jesus is either a lunatic or a liar, only that he is Lord.Jonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11272544252649766985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-146183364287787287.post-76293063098135151592013-03-22T14:06:35.458+10:002013-03-22T14:06:35.458+10:00It seems to me that if we will entertain the idea ...It seems to me that if we will entertain the idea that the Bible is not an accurate record of God and Jesus Christ, then there is little point in making any argument for Christianity, or accepting the Christian faith as one's religion or faith. Is it even <i>possible</i> to put up an apologetic for the Christian faith if we start with the premise that the Bible is not an accurate record?Hermithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12485029319098423399noreply@blogger.com